disagreed, yet didn't bother saying why...i'll chalk that one up as a fanboys disagree then! hurt feelings perhaps?
perhaps you just unknowingly answered the question. that this massive edge that people on here think exists, is only in the heads and collective know-nothingness of the members!
yeah kz2 looks amazing, and runs on an amazing game engine, but is there an concrete proof that the 360 couldn't run it? i've not yet seen any, although i've heard plenty of people without a single seconds dev experience claiming such, there's no proof what-so-ever!
it's microsofts lack o...
are you sure you played the demo? coz there was no 50unit cap!
30units unsc, and 40 covenent! me thinks someone is lying.
then i like the little fanboy slanted comment about processing power effecting the cap. probably if this was a ps3 game it would be closer to 500units rite??
gotta love fanboys
i did notice that you have tried a couple of non-sony-fanboy-pat-on-the-bac k blogs lately and got flamed for them. so you've returned to the safety blanket hit getting attack on the 360 stuff, which is guaranteed 1000degrees and 100+ comments..
a thread devoid of fanboys.
perhaps they all got shy when they saw sex wrote down...because i doubt any of them get any.
i wish every thread was like this.
as usual, you open your mouth, and out pours pure unadulterated fanboy know-nothingness!
please post a link confriming this two game contract?
and answer why something thats confirmed as a trilogy, and has lots of $ pumped into it by microsft. would then only be secured by them for two games?? man you talk absolute rubbish!
oh yeah, i remember reading once where you claimed to be married..lol then you write hings like
"Kratos would OWN...
i've got a 360, and i know i'll be buying plenty of games this year. whether 3rd or 1st party....the insercurity of the sony army is only matched by their desperation to find girlfriends and a life outside their homes.
silellak: forget it mate. dont bother trying to speak sense to the brainwashed.
nicklni: i actually agree with your comment about the admin/moderators or lack-og on here....n4g admi/mods are by far the most useless cretins on the net. their level o...
same ol faces aswell...lol
if you want to find the majority of the posters who replyed to the first poster, then just check any 360 related articles for fud spreading losers.
good ol n4g!
i played the campaign on veteran lol, unbelievable! magnetised grenades that rain down with pin-point accuracy even through smoke! marksmen enemies, respawning enemies, so no matter how many you kill, there will still be same number you started with 5mins ago. oh and not forgetting the horrible collision detection....where you have to lean out 3 feet from the crate your hiding behind because of the invisble barriers blocking the bullets. great job treyarch!
and the multi-player...
i've got some points on the 360. i wont mind spending them on this.
is this confirmed for the ps3 yet?
perhaps people should stop being sheep, and putting so much faith in the opinions of others. if you're unsure rent first!
sarcasm: what are you doing in here anyway? isn't there a killzone thread that needs some fanboy love! bubbles minus..
i'll pick this up eventually. i've still got infinite undiscovery and last remnant sitting under my tv unplayed! on the last disc of lost odyssey, and have just finished the knothole fable expansion....to many rpgs, not enough tim...
and the prequel coming on the next xbox running on the unreal4 engine. smart move by epic and microsoft.
for once gwave, i actually agree with you mate. some big battles would be great.
mgoelite: the story in metal gear was purposely dragged out so sequel could follow sequel. i'm kojima never thought "oh i know, i'll create a universe that will need four games to fulfil it's potential.
please enlighten me. if i'm backed into a corner, and my argument was flawed, can you show me where i went wrong?
many thanks.
the ps1 and ps2 had a ton of 3rd party exclu because it had little or no competition.
neither sony or ms have a ton of 3rd party exclu because the competition is healthy this time. microsoft have tried to make the 360 and pc mutually beneficial. i.e: plenty of games exclu to both systems and not sonys, yet all the fanboys like you condemn them for it and say "it's not exclusive"(said in squeaky teenage voice).
but whats the point of trying to explain on...
where did all of sonys studios come from? did they buy existing studios making them first paty? or did they put job adds in local and national papers around the world advertising for people in order to create studios??
get a clue ey!
a question for you, how many studios did sony own when they launched the ps1? and how many when they launched the ps2?
sites that write material just for n4g.
i feel like a parrot coz i keep repeating my self. but, it only has to be of a ccertain flavour in order to reach 1000degrees and generate 100+ hits of pure foaming at the mouth fanboyism.
just ask the owners of gamer.blorge.net and thegameraccess on where they get their hits....there's more, plenty more aswell...
your comment fails on so many levels it's beyond belief.
all this 360 fanboys ruin many a gaming site..lol. come on, just a look at your post history(and the size of your bubble tally clearly indicate on what side of the fence you sit on) proves that your pretend unbiased opinion is not worth the bandwidth used to read it.
anyway, even when i used to post on the ps forums, there was never a level of fanboyism on there like there is on here. every microsoft/360 th...
sony knows how to milk a franchise!